GMAT Quantitative Reasoning Example Problem

 

Don't be Afraid, Be Prepared!

Don’t be Afraid, Be Prepared!

“The GMAT Project” intends to ensure its readers are well prepared for all aspects of the GMAT. If you follow our weekly postings of example problems and solutions, we expect you to be more prepared than ever to not only succeed on the GMAT, but to get into your graduate school of choice.

  1. If [x] is the greatest integer less than or equal to x, what is the value of [-1.6] + [3.4] + [2.7]?
    1. 3
    2. 4
    3. 5
    4. 6
    5. 7

Before attempting to answer the question, you must understand [x] is an operation:

[x] = (Greatest Integer  x)

[x] is representative of the respective values of -1.6, 3.4, and 2.7, and for each of those values [x] must be an integer, which is a positive or negative whole number, and that integer must be less than or equal to the values of -1.6, 3.4, and 2.7.

The first thing you can do is disregard the verbiage “equal to.” Though -1.6, 3.4, and 2.7 are all real numbers, none of them is an integer as they all have decimal points. In light of this, we are now looking for the integer for each number that is less than but closest to that number in value.

The respective values of [x] for each of these numbers is

[-1.6] = -2

[3.4] = 3

[2.7] = 2

After arriving at these numbers it’s a simple matter of plugging them into the equation and solving:

[-1.6] + [3.4] + [2.7] = -2 + 3 + 2

[-1.6] + [3.4] + [2.7] = 3

Thus, the answer is (a).

Would you like to know more about the GMAT? Click here! Would you like to know more about GMAT test preparation and preparatory courses in your area? Click here!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *